Search Engines & SEO Blog
|
| # | Domain | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ohost.de | +203% | |
| 2 | youtube.com | +194% | |
| 3 | dpaq.de | +166% | |
| 4 | netzpolitik.org | +98% | |
| 5 | wie-sagt-man-noch.de | +93% | |
| 6 | drwindows.de | +82% | |
| 7 | duden.de | +78% | |
| 8 | musik-base.de | +71% | |
| 9 | felidoo.de | +67% | |
| 10 | forumieren.de | +63% | |
| 11 | dialo.de | +56% | |
| 12 | trivago.de | +45% | |
| 13 | tagesschau.de | +43% | |
| 14 | yellowmap.de | +41% | |
| 15 | db.de | +41% |
Parasite-hosting seems to be a subject that Google cannot really put a lid on: every few month we see a mass-host skyrocket to the top with numerous, mostly adult keywords and it will take Google a few weeks to react, probably manually. This time it’s ohost.de, while it will likely be some other host in the coming month. A definite sign of how helpless Google is when it comes to this came a few days ago, when they banned the whole cc.co domain with all its subdomains. Supremacy in dealing with SPAM definitely has a different look to it.
Seeing Youtube.com on the list might seem astonishing at first, so let’s take a short look at reasons for this: back in the day the Google-SERPs were simple – there were 10 results and that was it. When Google noticed that no one will use the picture- or video-vertical-searches by themselves, they came up with the Universal-Search idea: any time Google deems it useful, they will show Universal-Search results in addition to the 10 regular results in the SERPs. A few weeks ago, Google made some changes to some of the video-results: now, they will not be shown in addition to the 10 organic results but will replace one of those 10 results from the SERPs. Another change is that you will not be shown the familiar box with 3 or more videos anymore but only one video with screenshot. In these cases we decided to count the results as organic – which means they now count in the VisibilityIndex calculation and therefore explains the strong increase for YouTube.
The dpaq.de is an interesting phenomenon: the URL-shortener for the Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa) hides behind this domain. They decided on offering this service themselves because they do not trust the public options. Surprisingly, they decided on implementing the usually correct method of blocking the whole domain for searchengines with the help of the robots.txt-file. The problem here is that Google abides to the robots.txt and does not know that all there is to this domain is redirects to the actual content. The fact that a lot of very strong links point to the URLs is the reason why Google still ranks them – and not just anywhere, for keywords like easyjet, wettervorhersage or dönerhersteller they rank in the top-10. SEO by accident, congratulation.
Losers
| # | Domain | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | urlpuls.de | -99% | |
| 2 | bizzinformation.de | -97% | |
| 3 | lightinthebox.com | -97% | |
| 4 | lg.com | -81% | |
| 5 | taz.de | -65% | |
| 6 | satzeile.de | -63% | |
| 7 | essen.de | -62% | |
| 8 | wunderkarten.de | -60% | |
| 9 | gutscheinz.com | -56% | |
| 10 | webnews.de | -49% | |
| 11 | popula.de | -49% | |
| 12 | baulinks.de | -45% | |
| 13 | linkedin.com | -44% | |
| 14 | robtex.com | -44% | |
| 15 | webwiki.de | -25% |
Once again we see numerous aggregators, with next to no visible added value, on the losing end of the Google-index for June. Domains like urlplus.de were some of the winners on last month’s list, it looks like Google decided that the quality of the content did not justify the number of visitors send their way and took countermeasures. Similar reasons explain the fall of domains like bizzinformation.de or robtex.com.
I was a little surprised by the large decrease in the visibility of taz.de, even though sometimes the content would justify such a loss. Taking a first look, I was not able to make out any SEO-reasons why they should have lost such a large chunk of their visibility. They managed to decrease their visibility from a high of more than 30 points to less than 10 points at the time of writing – external trafficmeasuring-tools like Google Trends also show a distinct decline in visitor-numbers since the start of the year.
Comments & Trackbacks
1
07/21/2011 at 04:45
I thought I noticed more youtube videos ranking for some tough keywords. I don't think it's a bad thing, but seo will have to change up their tactics to take advantage of it.
2
07/21/2011 at 15:05
Hi Johannes
Great article as usual. Interesting info about the inclusion of Youtube in the results. In addition to sponsored ads, I think it is becoming increasing difficult to actually get clickthroughs when on page 1 of Google SERPs. Clicks from a #1 listing are even going down.
BTW: I have read your articles on Panda and am wondering if it is possible for you to have a quick look to see why you think my site lost 35% of traffic since the Panda update? I don't know what we've done wrong, apart from putting Wordpress on the front end and adding new articles. The landing pages that have lost most traffic are on static html pages (I'd paste them, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate to paste a bunch of my links in a comment here) that are not in Wordpress. Could this be the cause?
Also, we've lost lots of long tail traffic for some reason too.
Sincerely
Dan Bacon
Great article as usual. Interesting info about the inclusion of Youtube in the results. In addition to sponsored ads, I think it is becoming increasing difficult to actually get clickthroughs when on page 1 of Google SERPs. Clicks from a #1 listing are even going down.
BTW: I have read your articles on Panda and am wondering if it is possible for you to have a quick look to see why you think my site lost 35% of traffic since the Panda update? I don't know what we've done wrong, apart from putting Wordpress on the front end and adding new articles. The landing pages that have lost most traffic are on static html pages (I'd paste them, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate to paste a bunch of my links in a comment here) that are not in Wordpress. Could this be the cause?
Also, we've lost lots of long tail traffic for some reason too.
Sincerely
Dan Bacon
3
07/24/2011 at 18:23
Thanks of the run down on how google serp results are changing the way youtube video results are displayed. "they will not be shown in addition to the 10 organic results but will replace one of those 10 results from the SERPs." Looks like will have to become better at making videos.
4
07/28/2011 at 21:28
I'm a little surprised to see linkedin dropping by 44% I didn't think the sight was going to be big hit like FB or anything but that's a huge hit.
5
07/30/2011 at 16:43
Very nice statistic...
6
08/01/2011 at 08:33
I positively venerate celebration of a mass your blog posts, a accumulation of essay is smashing.This blog as common was educational, we have had to bookmark your site as well as allow to your feed in ifeed. Your thesis looks lovely.Thanks for sharing.
7
08/03/2011 at 22:20
Very much helpful topic sir,
i like that and i want to say that i am totally agree with you.
i like that and i want to say that i am totally agree with you.
8
08/12/2011 at 04:28
Looking at the chart, I begins to wonder how unimaginable Google can be. One moment, you can be in their good book and at another moment, you will have a round house kick to the butt. Take a look at the web site urlpuls.de, 99% drop in traffic! That is terrifying! SEO is really getting harder and harder.
Add Comment
This posting is older than 30 days and therefore closed for new comments.














